Category Archives: Uncategorized

Charles Mudede at Urban Design Forum: Tonight!

“Urban Development without Economic Growth”

5:30-7pm at Vermillion Gallery/Bar (Free!)

Details here: http://www.aiaseattle.org/node/8987?utm_source=enews+July+2014&utm_campaign=DiP+enews+July+27&utm_medium=email

Advertisements

[Podcast] Making Cities Work for Women: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Urban Policy

the city

wtc

Dr. Sylvia Bashevkin and urban planner Prabha Khosla speak at the Women Transforming Cities National Conference convened on May 30, 2013. Dr. Bashevkin is Professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto and author of Tales of Two Cities: Women and Municipal Restructuring in London and Toronto (UBC Press). Ms. Khosla is an urban planner who works on cities, equalities, and democratic local governance. She has worked on issues of women’s rights and gender equality, social inclusion, urban sustainability, urban environments, democratizing local governance, water and sanitation, and training and capacity building for close to twenty years. Her recent publications include A Training Package: Improving Gender Equality and Grassroots Participation through Good Land Governance and Gender in Local Government: A Sourcebook for Trainers.

Dr. Bashevkin’s speaks to the question – How do women transform cities? – and Ms. Khosla discusses gender equality and social inclusion in municipal policies and…

View original post 1 more word

Eric Mazur and the Suppression of a Utopian Past

Another topic worth discussing in relation to critical design: classroom pedagogy in the current atmosphere of online education in a post-utopian world.

Posthegemony

Eric MazurThe past few days my institution has been hosting Eric Mazur, a Harvard physicist who has made a name for himself in the world of “flexible learning” for his tweaks to the university lecture format to create what is sometimes called a “flipped classroom.”

His visit was muchhyped by the university, and drew a large crowd. As he himself tells us, it was his fourth lecture in as many countries and as many days. Mazur is a big shot.

Essentially, his pedagogical tweaks involve the use of technology to incorporate student feedback and discussion. His technique is for the lecturer to introduce a concept, then pose a question. After responses to the question have been gathered, students discuss their answers among themselves before answering the question again; the lecturer goes over the correct answer and moves on. The point is that ideally students will have taught each…

View original post 720 more words

Thoughts on the Wikihouse and Design Democracy

More and more I see the conversation come up around the meaning of Design Democracy for the masses. Democracy is a strongly held value of mine, and part of what makes me interested in design is the creative potential it can unleash to literally shape our lives. So, when I saw the title of this TED talk,  Architecture for the people by the people, my ears perked.

Alastair Parvin on TED

There’s a lot to take away from Alastair Parvin’s talk. He rightly points out that in order to solve this world’s pressing problems (sustainability, rapid urbanization, and social inequality to name a few) we’re going to have to rethink the practice of architectural design beyond it’s traditional constituency of the top 1%. This means finding a different imperative and financing model for design. This means finding solutions that more people can take part in. I argue that often times “the people” are firstly the users of the space itself and secondly those that its built form impacts.

Here’s where I think Parvin falls short: he argues against a top-down design model while proposing a mass-distributed blue-print for a standardized home. So, while the labor gets localized, the design does not. But, what if you live in a part of the world where a gabled roof is not customary, where you need a house on stilts in case of flood, or where traditional homes are made circular rather than rectangular? The very nature of a mass-distributed blueprint is that it limits the ability to customize. This takes us right back to the top-down approach that Parvin argues against.

The danger of these one-size fits all solutions is that they miss the mark on what I think really puts the democracy in design: participation. And I’m not just talking about participating in building (in fact, most of the 99% already do that) but in the creative design process. I believe that people are the best experts about their own lives, and that without real participation democracy is just a buzzword. Is it helpful to have, tools, best practices, and suggested shortcuts? Sure. But as soon as we start to assume what the solution literally looks like, we are erring dangerously towards buzzword democracy.

Secondly, is anyone asking how the 99% get access to the 3-D printers needed to construct a  Wikihouse?  I’m a graduate student in the richest country in the world, and even I couldn’t tell you where I’d find one. It seems like an obvious question, but sadly its omission is symptomatic of a larger trend of interventions that don’t create opportunities for the masses to access the information, relationships, and material (including money) necessary to scale solutions like these up. I don’t mean to suggest that the Wikihouse folks are completely blind to this, but all to0 often inventors, industries, universities, and entrepreneurs come up with technical solutions without coming up with a plan for how the people that most need these solutions actually get access to them.

While I have my critiques, I appreciate that Parvin is taking a stab at a solution, and its only through trying some things out that we can come up with something better. I challenge him and the rest of us to take the Wikihouse concept a step further by thinking about how to scale up on solutions without sacrificing participation, customization, and opportunities that grant access.

Whether you’re thinking “right on, preach woman!” or “what a negative Nancy” go ahead and watch the clip to make up your own mind. Don’t forget to let me know where you stand in the comments below.

Lynda Turet is a graduate student in Geography at the University of Washington. Holler at her at http://www.lyndaturet.com